
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

To view the earlier edition
of our news page see our original, non-indexed archives, our newer archives or return to our index of archives
Caveat Lector
Online newspaper registrations can lead to more than articles
(See our note at the bottom of this article about the "bugmenot" service)
CASPIAN staffers often spend much of their online time reading through various articles throughout the world on privacy and retail matters. We are growing weary, (as I suspect are many of you), of having to go through a lengthy registration processes in order to read a single article at a publication we are unlikely to revisit for years, if at all. And while many newspapers may employ reasonable tactics in their registration process, one recent experience opened our eyes as to how far some businesses will go in order to collect your personal information and then surreptitiously use it to market to you.
The Press-Enterprise is a southern California newspaper owned by Belo Interactive. In order to access any content within the site you must register, and I've archived the top half of the registration page here with the bottom half here. The first thing I like to do before submitting my personal information to a site I know nothing about is to take a look at the Privacy Policy, however the link shown on the top of the registration page that leads to the Privacy Policy actually lead to a "page not found" error, as archived here.
Strike one.
I did some digging around, and managed to find the actual Privacy Policy located on another page. Along with the usual wording it contained this statement:
We may also use your Personal Information, such as your e-mail address or mailing address, to contact you regarding products and/or services that may be of interest to you [...]
I was not too thrilled to see that the "price" for reading a single article, in a paper I had never been to before in more than 7 years of online reading and never expected to visit again, was to submit to a potential onslaught of never-ending advertising. But I also noticed that on the registration page I could uncheck the pre-checked "Yes! I want to be notified of any MySpecialsDirect exclusive discounts and special offers" box so I assumed I was safe from this threat provided I "opted-out". Since there was only that single box on the registration page relating to advertising I assumed it was all I needed to worry about and continued with the process. It was admittedly a poor assumption on my part.
On the registration page you are given a chance to select your "hobbies". Actually, you are REQUIRED to select at least one, even if it is just "other", which you find out when you fail to do so and it rejects your application, as archived here. The page reloads, highlighting the section you missed, but with all the information that you entered on the page intact with one notable exception: the "MySpecialDirect" box is once again checked even if you unchecked it before, an easily missed item.
Strike 2.
Definition of nanosecond: the amount of time between when you hit "submit" and realize you shouldn't have.
I of course missed the "easily missed item", and went back to correct it. Because I didn't know if I managed to catch it in time I decided to take a look at the "members preferences" page to make sure I wasn't set to receive any advertising. The "MySpecialDirect" box was indeed unchecked, but I was amazed to see that had "opted in" to receiving:
1) Phone calls
2) Postal advertising
3) Email advertising
(archived here.)
Strike 3.
I went back and re-read the privacy policy where further down the page it stated:
There are four contact preference options available: (1) “opt-in” includes you in our special offer, discount and other programs with respect to our advertisers and partners via our My Specials Direct e-mail program or a similar program; (2) “site” includes you in our special offer, discount and other programs that relate to this Site from PE.com; (3) “phone” allows you to be contacted by telephone with respect to any of these programs, and (4) “mail” allows you to be contacted by mail with respect to any of these programs. You may choose to be contacted by any or all of these methods, or “opt-out” by not selecting any contact options.
Technically, they appear to have covered this within the Privacy Policy, but the wording is far from clear. If you can "choose to be contacted by any or all of these methods", why would you need to "opt-out"? And while it states you can "'opt-out' by not selecting any contact options", they don't give you the option to "select" until it was already done for you.
What is technically sound isn't necessarily ethically sound. Few people read privacy policies, a well known fact by those within the industry. By intentionally placing a single box pertaining to advertising options within their registration process they are misleading people into believing that it is the only option available, even though it is only one of four advertising options. I'm sure it works quite well for them and while they may get few people signing up for "MySpecialDirect" I suspect they have a veritable flood of "willing" recipients for "email marketing, phone solicitations and postal solicitations".
Online businesses have a hard enough time attracting consumers and gaining their confidence without sleazy tactics such as this. The periodicals industry needs to both police their own and come up with reasonable standards that should be followed before consumers begin to look elsewhere and regulatory agencies are forced to step in. If the industry needs an example of what happens when you fail to respect your customers they need look no further than the telemarketing industry and the myriad of state and federal laws which now regulate it.
And for those of you within the industry that are mulling this over, please take another look at your mandatory registration practices. It makes no sense, for either you or me, to require registration from someone who is seeking out a single article on a single topic that you will probably never cover again. If you think someone from the Midwest is a good candidate for a subscription to a newspaper in California you've been hanging around breathing the newsprint fumes for far too long. We understand registration is a tool that helps you better compete and can find little fault in requiring it for regular readers. But why not just set a cookie for the occasional reader and require registration only for those that come back within a short time period, perhaps 7 days? Could the cookie be erased by the user so they wouldn't have to register? Sure, but think about it: do you really believe that people that go to that much trouble are actually good advertising prospects? And by eliminating the people that you have virtually -0- chance of successfully marketing to you might actually find your databases contain worthwhile information, instead of being filled with the garbage most people insert in order to bypass the system.
Think about it: its better for you, and your "real" customers, advertisers and consumers alike.
For another look at online registration, see this Wired article.
(A number of readers have written to us to suggest bugmenot as a solution to this problem. Bugmenot collects logins from users that others can then use to bypass the registration process. I've had mixed results with this; in some cases I've been able to log right in and in others finding that none of the various logins they suggest would work. Some web sites are also aware of this and rather than accept the fact that not everyone is willing to give them their life history to read a single article they disable those accounts they believe are used by multiple people.)
Card purchase records lead to arrest
Arson charges filed after fire starter purchase
KOMO TV in Seattle has reported that a veteran Lieutenant with the Tukwila Fire department was arrested for attempted arson after a fire at his own home. The station stated "Lyons' arrest came after detectives learned a grocery store card in his name showed he had purchased several fire starters." We have no way of knowing for certain why detectives decided to search those records but speculate that such data collection has probably become routine with at least some police departments.
We decline to speculate on the possible guilt or innocence of the suspect, focusing instead on a number of reasonable explanations for why the purchases could have shown up on his record. Fire starters are not an uncommon item, and it is quite possible the Lieutenant purchased them for camping or in his home fireplace. Even if he did purchase them with the attempt to commit arson wouldn't most people forgo the minor savings the card provides in order to avoid having the purchase tracked? And what better way to frame someone than to purchase an item identical to one you observed them buying in the past?
Retail stores attempt to portray privacy fears as being groundless but the fact remains that this data is accessible, and will continue to be so for years. And even though this data "might" help law enforcement officers, the potential is equally large to implicate people who have committed no crime.
The Surveillance-Industrial Complex
ACLU releases report on government access to consumer databases
The ACLU has released a 38 page report titled The Surveillance-Industrial Complex: How the American Government is Conscripting Businesses and Individuals in the Construction of a Surveillance Society. With the "The Privatization of Surveillance", the ACLU states:
The U.S. security establishment is rapidly increasing its ability to monitor average Americans by hiring or compelling private-sector corporations to provide billions of customer records. The explosive growth in surveillance by government and business is creating a "Surveillance Industrial Complex" that threatens all of our privacy.
The complete report is available at the above link, as well as methods to contact companies to urge them to respect your privacy. The Albuquerque Tribune also followed up with their local ACLU chapter and filed this report
Albertsons' goes on shopping spree
New England and California grocers added to Albertsons' "family"
Albertsons went on a recent spending spree, picking up approximately 200 New England based Shaws and
Star Market stores, and then gobbling up the 11 stores of upscale Southern California grocer "Bristol Farms".
The Shaws/Star Market purchase, (the nations 11th largest chain prior to the acquisition), brings the total number of Albertsons' retail locations to nearly 2500.
The Bristol purchase marks Albertsons' first foray into the upscale grocery market. It also marks the first time we've seen a major supermarket spell out their true intentions within their Press Release without sugarcoating it for the masses:
"We are thrilled to welcome Bristol Farms to Albertsons' world class family of stores," said
Larry Johnston, chairman, CEO and president of Albertsons. "Bristol Farms has clearly built a solid
leadership position in the Southern California specialty, gourmet market segment with strong performance
over the past several years. This acquisition is the latest example of our dedication to diversify into new
formats that can accelerate growth, tap into new customer segments and maximize return on invested capital."
There you have it. No smarmy language about their "commitment to serving their customers".
No superfluous comments on "maintaining high quality and service".
Just the basic facts of the modern supermarket world: monopolize, conquer, and profit.
Resistance is futile, you will be assimilated.
Albertsons' rolls out another card program
Osco Customers must use "preferred" card for discounts
On a visit to the local OSCO store recently we discovered that Albertsons' has decided to impose their dreaded
"Preferred" card on OSCO shoppers. We find this to be somewhat ironic in that OSCO was one of the first stores
in the U.S. to have a card program which was dropped many years ago, (to the applause of OSCO shoppers everywhere).
That previous failure may well have formed part of the genesis of Albertsons' long forgotten pledge to their
customers of "great prices without a card".
The customers don't forget though: while card free stores such as Publix have managed comparable store sales gains of 4.9% and 3% in the last two quarters, Albertsons' sales have climbed a pitiful .2%, and .3%, (omitting California sales figures, which, if included, dropped the comparable store sales to -1.3% and -3.7%). Throw in the negative statistics from the strike battered California stores, (where customers who returned after the strike found they needed a card to get the same sale prices they always received), and it would appear that Albertsons' shoppers are "preferring" to shop at stores that have more respect for their privacy.
How safe is your card data?
Programmer
leaves secret "back door" into database
Businesses that run "loyalty" programs frequently state how important
it is to protect their customers' privacy, but three recent articles
show that consumers have ample reason to be concerned. In Information Week we found the following quote
regarding one supermarket chain's database:
"Unisys chief security adviser Sunil Misra tells of a
case where a member of the senior IT staff at a large supermarket chain
created a secret backdoor so he could access and sell protected
information."
While this security hole was found, (and we don't know if any
information was indeed sold), there is no way of knowing if, or how
many, others might exist. Even without a "back door" the data is still
vulnerable, as outlined in a Bloomberg.com article concerning the recent theft
of customer data at AOL. 92 million AOL screen names, along with their
phone numbers and zip codes, were pilfered by an AOL employee, and then
sold to spammers. Criminal intent isn't required for data release, as
noted in this Register article that investigates a hard drive
sold on Ebay that contained sensitive customer data.
While it is difficult, if not impossible, to reduce the chance of
incidents such as the second and third happening in any company with
which you do business, you can certainly limit your liability by
reducing or eliminating your participation in programs where it is not
mandatory for you to provide personal information. And as a reminder,
even if you are using a "fake" identity with your local supermarket as
soon as you write a check or use a credit card they can tie that
information to your "fake" profile.
For more information on why using a fake name is not a solution, please
see our page located here
How safe is your card data
part II
Information
sold on open market
Regular CASPIAN readers will remember that after the
9/11 tragedy a supermarket voluntarily gave their "loyalty" card data
to federal authorities in the hope it might help find the perpetrators.
Two recent articles caught our eye that suggest the release of this
data may be more routine than the supermarkets would lead us to believe.
In the Atlanta Journal-Constitution database analyst Joe
Patel is quoted as saying:
"Grocery stores routinely sell
and trade customer preference databases compiled from those
ever-popular discount shopping cards"
On the other side of the pond, Media Week states that Tesco, Thomas Pink, MVC
and New Look have all released their customer information for sale to
other marketers, and in the article below we
detail the sale of card program data from retailer FootAction.
Our crystal ball is on the fritz so we can't predict where the next
release of data will occur but the verdict is clear: if you don't want
your personal data floating around the world you need to take steps to
reduce your exposure.
The
perils of privacy
databases
result in unintended consequences for consumers
As databases grow, both in
size and scope, we are starting to see more cases where consumers have
found themselves in uncomfortable situations due to erroneous
conclusions by those looking at the data. With so much information
being collected and new uses being found for it every day, situations
such as those below are likely to also increase.
In the UK a woman answered a knock at her door only to find herself
arrested and her house searched from top to bottom. Her crime? Placing
her own scarf in her handbag. Store security caught the move on
camera and mistakenly thought she had stolen the scarf, and then
tracked her through her "loyalty" card (The article doesn't state why
they didn't just stop her in the store rather than wait two days to go
to her house).
We can't be certain but we suspect most true criminals are not nearly
as thoughtful towards authorities in providing their identity.
A family in California underwent a similar ordeal when authorities
obtained a warrant to search their home believing they had a marijuana
growing operation. Their crime? Having 3 kids that often left the
lights on, lots of laundry, and electricity guzzling appliances such as
computers that raised their power bill enough to spark the interest of
the police.
Word to the wise: anyone attempting to duplicate the work of Dr.
Frankenstein would be advised to purchase a large gas powered generator
before proceeding.
If our suspects above were hungry and ordered a pizza, they may have
found their troubles starting anew. According to USA Today the state of Missouri is using pizza
delivery databases to find scofflaws. Pizza databases were found to be
particularly effective, since people need to give out their correct
address if they actually want to receive that pizzas they order.
We'll take ours with pepperoni and extra cheese, hold the invasive
profiling.
If you do happen to find yourself arrested without cause, the good news
is you won't have to find a lawyer: they will find you. According to USA Today , courts now routinely sell arrest
records to database vendors, who promptly package them up and sell them
to lawyers. It's amazing how quickly the lawyers come calling. Consider
the case of a mentally ill man who was recently taken into custody.
While his parents spent two days trying to locate him before
authorities contacted them, letters from attorneys seeking his business
were postmarked hours after the arrest.
The article didn't mention whether these attorneys handle
invasion-of-privacy suits as well as criminal ones.
Sources: ICNetwork, The Star-Telegram
What do they know about you?
A little
information goes a long way in establishing a consumer's profile
On more
occasions than we care to count the phrase "why should I care who knows
if I buy bread and milk" comes across our desk. While alone these may
appear to be meaningless tidbits of little value, when combined with
other data they form a complete picture of every consumer. As the
technology improves for sorting the data, so does the thirst for
putting it to use.
As noted in USA Today, databases LAST. While bread and
milk may appear innocuous, if you start buying more it may signal an
increase in the numbers of members of your household. If you usually
purchase coke and ice cream and start buying diet coke and salad it may
indicate a few extra inches around the waist you are attempting to
lose. The products are only part of the picture: MediaWeek goes on to say, "Consequently, what
is starting to happen is that marketers are analyzing behaviour and
making assumptions. For example, if a customer has regularly started
buying nappies it is safe to assume that they have had a baby.". If
the vision of MediaWeek were to come true, soon your interactive
television will have a place for you to insert your card, (to be
"rewarded" of course), at which point they can gain more valuable
information about both what you are watching, and when you are doing it.
And why is any of this a problem? Because the government, through
programs such as TIA and MATRIX are now accessing that data, and likely
will continue to. Perhaps USA Today's Andrew Kantor says it best:
In our country, we govern ourselves. Government is us.
So imagine living in a neighborhood where your neighbors inspect your
groceries every time you come back from the store, look to see who's
sending you mail, and keep track of where you drive. Would you want to
live there?
Remember:
you are what you eat.
Politically correct profits
"Fair-Trade"
goods help some retail stores far more than farmers
A Wall St. Journal article, reprinted at Truth About Trade, takes a look at "Fair-Trade"
goods: products that are intended to give farmers a decent, living wage
for their efforts. While the farmers do indeed make more than they
might otherwise, the best profits often go to the supermarkets.
One U.K. supermarket tacked on $3.46 per pound for Fair-Trade coffee
while the grower gets about 44 cents above the world market price. The
same chain sold Fair-Trade bananas at nearly $2 more per Lb, while the
grower received a mere 16 cents more.
Not all stores follow this practice: Whole Foods prices their
Fair-Trade bananas and coffee at the same price as their regular
organic brands. However, Whole Foods also lined coffee aisles with
flyers stating that 5% of sales went to growers, but that percentage
doesn't refer to the retail price, rather it is based on wholesale
costs. Borders Book Stores were also found to be charging nearly $4 per
Lb more for Fair-Trade coffee, substantially more than the growers
received. When questioned about it they stated they "we have been
prompted to assess our pricing", and promptly lowered the price.
Fair-Trade products can be an excellent way to help ensure farmers
throughout the world receive decent wages for their efforts, but if you
wish to participate you should make sure the extra money you spend
makes it into the hands of the intended, and not the retail store's
stockholders.
Personal Privacy a
thing of the past?
A future
where employers monitor your every breath
A Businessweek Online interview with futurist Faith
Popcorn points to a rosy world where your employer will take care of
your every need and personal privacy fails to exist.
"[...] your employer will be
taking care of all your personal and physical needs to increase your
productivity. Your kids, your dinner, your clothing needs, your books,
your movies -- would all be provided through your company. For
instance, your vital signs will be measured at work. If the
measurements say you have high cholesterol and too much fat in your
diet, you might get prescription menus. And the food would be delivered
to your refrigerator at your home nearby. "
She goes on to state:
"Sensors will measure your
stress levels, your food needs levels, your psychological levels.
They'll measure if some problem with your kids or your mate is
affecting your productivity. All your needs will be measured and
prescribed and fulfilled. The happier the worker, the higher the
productivity -- and companies are starting to realize that already."
We can't help but wonder if in the latter situation the
corporate legal department would be called in to initiate divorce
proceedings on your behalf; for the good of the company of course.
All we can say is "Wow, that sure sounds like a fun life".
Not.
The
interactive urinal
The latest in
intrusive advertising
We thought we'd seen it all,
but this new device tops everything for intrusive advertising. As
reported in The Washington Times, "Wizmark", is marketing a
new "interactive urinal display". A 3.5" screen is activated by
movement or the flow of fluids, and includes flashing lights and a
message.
Unless we miss our mark, we expect similar intrusions to continue.
TIA alive and well?
If the
government isn't monitoring us, where ARE they getting all this
information?
Every once
in a while you run across something that just makes you go hmmmmmm,
and a few recent articles have had that effect on us. First up: a Sulphur Daily News report that authorities
questioned a Louisiana woman about credit card purchases made at Lowes,
investigating "spending habits that entailed the purchase of large
quantities of material conducive to the manufacture of bombs".
While possible, it would seem unlikely that a credit card company would
install software to flag such purchases, and virtually impossible for
it to be found in any other way. One reasonable explanation would be
that a cashier flagged the purchase, but the article states the
questioning arose due to credit card purchases. So how'd they get the
data?
In the middle of the country, the The Riverfront Times reports that a St. Louis man
was visited by the Secret Service after using the words "Bush" and "bin
Laden" in the same sentence in an email to a neighbor he was feuding
with. The man believes that the neighbor may have turned him in, but
there has been no confirmation on where the Secret Service obtained a
copy of the email.
And finally, Capitol Hill Blue is reporting that TIA is alive
and well and living in Arlington, VA. Even though Congress cut off
funding for the program, this report states it was just moved into the
pentagon's secret "black bag" funding.
We're sure there must be some mistake, as nobody would ever lie to
Congress about secretive programs. Ollie North told us so.
Albertsons rolls out California card program
When labor
lockout ends, card program begins
On November 22nd, 2003, the North County Times ran this article which stated:
"Some of the goods on the shelf in Albertsons were posted
with "club" prices, despite the fact that Albertson's in Southern
California has no loyalty or club card program."
At the time we wondered if their plan was to start a
card program as soon as the labor problems were resolved, and sure
enough, this week Albertsons started running advertising announcing the
scheme.
The ad, a copy of which is located here, states:
"When the labor strike is over, saving money will get a
whole lot easier"
We're somewhat baffled as to why it would be "easier" to
be required to fill out a form and then show a card every time you
shop, however the reasoning behind the decision by Albertsons is
crystal clear. The data we have compiled from various sources shows
that when card programs begin, prices throughout the store rise. What
better time to start a card program then after you've lost millions of
dollars in a protracted labor dispute? What is considerably less clear
is whether California consumers, already alienated by the labor
troubles, will greet this new development with open arms. While it may
give a temporary boost to their bottom line, our prediction is that
over the long haul consumers will flock to their competitors.
Unfortunately, the bad news surrounding Albertsons doesn't end there.
The chain also recently announced a major restructuring of their
operations, and in their
press release stated one of the goals for centralizing some
portions of their operations as being: "executing powerful
merchandising promotions that make life easier for our customers."
While that doesn't explicitly state card programs are in the works for
the few remaining Albertsons locations that don't already have them, we
suspect it is only a matter of time, and a short time at that, before
all stores will adopt them.
It is hard to believe that a chain that at one time gained a
considerable following by promising "Great prices without a card"
has so completely changed course, and turned their backs on the
customers that trusted them.
Sources: KESQ TV, Palm Springs
Card free
supermarkets top survey
Publix,
Supervalue obtain highest ratings in customer satisfaction
The American Customer Satisfaction Index, a joint
project of the University of Michigan School of Business, the American
Society for Quality and CFI group, recently released their 4th quarter
satisfaction index, a copy of which can be found here.
The supermarket sector was led by Publix with the outstanding score of
82, (the highest score of any brick and mortar retailer), a 1.2%
increase from the previous year. Following a close second at 77 was
Supervalue, with the general category of "all others" next at 75.
Rounding out the bottom 4 are our not-so-favorite card stores:
Albertsons (73), Winn Dixie (73), Safeway (71) and Kroger (71). Both
Safeway and Kroger slipped dramatically during the past year: -6.6% and
-5.3% respectively, and Kroger has dropped an alarming 9% since the
baseline study in 1994.
While it is difficult to attribute the winners excellent scores
entirely to their card free status, we believe it certainly has a major
impact. After all, stores that respect their customers don't
require them to jump through hoops to get savings, nor do they try to
pull the wool over their eyes by stating savings that are inflated due
to excessive prices. The only way a business will gain respect is by
giving it, and our thanks go out to Publix, Supervalue, and all the
other small stores who scored well by respecting, and not manipulating,
their customers.
In a related development, Accenture released a new study on consumer
and business attitudes towards trust, privacy, and access to personal
data. While consumers were most trusting of their employers, banks and
health insurers, they were least trusting of online retailers and
supermarkets. This is in stark contrast to a study from two years ago
which showed 69% of Americans didn't trust corporate America, yet of
the businesses they did trust, supermarkets came in at number
1. As Ann Landers once said, "Wake up and smell the coffee". American
consumers have, its time for supermarket executives to do so as well.
Sources:Progressive Grocer, The Wise Marketer (registration required).
"Loyalty"
program data for sale
Footaction
"Starclub" membership information found on list broker web site
Most companies in the United
States supplement their income by selling lists of their customers,
most often without their knowledge or consent. If you subscribe to a
magazine or have purchased something through a catalog the odds are
high that your name, and your personal information, is being sold to
others. Most "loyalty" programs though are quite explicit in stating
your personal information will not be sold or rented to third parties.
While looking through various list brokers we came across this listing at Walter Karl Interactive for the
Footaction "loyalty" club. The membership is described as
"trend-setting, highly fashion conscious consumers" who are "Extremely
Direct Mail Responsive", with an average age from 14 to 26. Beside
the basic listings of 1,595,645 - 12 Month Loyalty Club Members, 50,808
- Monthly New Members, 376,148 - 12 Month Active Gold Club Members and
46,122 - Monthly Gold Club Members, purchasers can also select
additional items such as Phone Number, State, Zip code, Gender, Date of
Birth, Internet Source, Dollar - LP (last purchase), Dollar - AP
(annual purchase), and product. This is not particularly unusual in the
list brokerage business, and similar lists can be found by the
thousands. It only gained our attention because it is not often you see
"loyalty" club data for sale.
In investigating this story we were unable to determine what, if any,
privacy policy governs the data of "starclub" members, or if the sale
of the information violates any stated promise to consumers. While
Footaction.com does have a privacy policy online, there is no way of
knowing if it governs their "starclub" members as well, and it in fact
does allow for them to "share the information with their business
partners or others that are prescreened by Footstar". Many people would
be surprised to learn that this "sharing" happens through list brokers,
and that the listing contains no mention of "pre screening" by
Footstar. (Some listings DO state within them the mailing must
be pre approved by the company.)
As "loyalty" programs proliferate throughout the world we expect to
find similar lists for sale in the future. For anyone considering
joining one of these programs you might want to read through the
application form to make sure your purchases don't end up being sold to
the highest bidder.
You're not paranoid: they ARE watching you
Retail
surveillance surreptitiously monitors shoppers
Two recent
articles highlight the depths retailers will go to in order to
determine the optimal method of selling their products. Tracking Hot Spots, appearing in the Portland
Maine Press Herald on January 27th, takes a look at how one local
Hannaford grocery allowed an Oregon business to set up an extensive
tracking system in their store. The system collected data on where the
shoppers traveled, and then married their register purchase information
to with the route taken. While the store stated the information was not
tied to individual users, that is small comfort for the people who were
used as lab rats.
In Soon, marketing will follow you, Wired magazine
investigates if the futuristic scenario from the movie "Minority
Report" is actually in the future, or if it exists today. While
widespread implementation has yet to see the light of day, primarily
due to cost, devices that can determine your profile and then produce
marketing that is directed to you are already in the testing phase.
Using facial recognition technology that can determine race, age and
sex, these devices then produce a marketing message geared towards your
demographics. It isn't hard to imagine in the near future these devices
being coupled to the extensive data being compiled on the general
population, especially the information gleaned through "loyalty"
programs, and the messages truly become targeted to one individual. But
in one telling comment retail consultant Paco Underhill, the founder of
Envirosell,stated:
"One of the realities of our lives is that we have a
consumer base out there that is reacting very badly to some of the ways
technology and marketing have met," he says.
Perhaps it
is more appropriate to just state that the consumer base is tired of
the constant prodding and pushing of direct marketing and would prefer
to just be left alone.
Anti-card legislation proposed in Colorado
Senate bill
would prohibit card programs in supermarkets
Colorado State Senator Ken Chlouber recently introduced
Senate Bill 04-081 which would prohibit supermarkets from offering
discounts tied to a card. Senator Chlouber stated in a Durango Herald
article "I think it's an incredible violation of privacy, and I don't
like them keeping records on what I buy". Senator Chlouber indicated
the bill would likely face a fight and even if the bill should fail the
public will have gained knowledge about how these programs operate.
CASPIAN has always advocated a free market approach to this issue and
has not taken a stance on this legislation. however we have offered our
assistance to the Colorado legislature to provide pertinent information
on the issue as needed. The bill is currently in committee.
Sources: The Durango Herald, Rocky Mountain News.
QFC struggles to
regain lost customers
Chain relaxes
card usage requirements
When Kroger owned QFC started their card program CASPIAN
was inundated with letters from upset and concerned QFC shoppers. The
opposition was strong with extensive media coverage, much of which is
detailed on our QFC page. QFC initially responded by telling
people to use a fake name to apply, a move that surprised even us, and
one that has now been repeated by Albertsons.
Almost two years have passed since the debut of the card, but according
to this King County Journal article things are still not
going well for QFC. Seattle grocery analyst Jeff Tryka stated "The
quality's declined, but the prices haven't". In an attempt to woo
back lost customers QFC has now gone one step further; eliminating the
need to identify each card with an individual. All customers now need
to do is flash their card at the cashier, and then punch in any ten
digit number.
While this certainly makes card programs somewhat more palatable for
those in Seattle, it still doesn't change the fact that our research
shows stores with card programs have the highest of prices, and Seattle
consumers would probably be better off taking their business elsewhere.
Card
focus shifting
Future
discounts to be based on purchase history
One of the great laments about
card programs within the industry has been the inability to capitalize
on all the data that has been collected. That is all starting to change
with new programs that allow retail establishments to base their offers
on past shopping history. For the average consumer, (and statistically
that includes 70% of us), the likely outcome will be less offers and
higher prices, as discounts are geared only towards the most profitable
customers.
Super Fresh, an A&P owned chain, recently modified their "loyalty"
program to one with three different levels of benefits, with membership
in each level based on the customers past purchase history. Super Fresh
is working with Denver based Customer Communications Group to develop
the program, and Sallie Burnett, CCG's vice president of national
sales, had these interesting comments about the program:
"Our role
was to take this data and make it actionable and relevant to the
customer, and to develop programs to communicate to that customer based
on the customer value to the organization."
"The loyalty program itself becomes an infrastructure to deliver
targeted offers for the course of the year and to respond to customer
behavior accordingly"
One can only assume that
responding "accordingly" is unlikely to be a GOOD thing for
those customers who's "value to the organization" isn't rated very
highly.
Using a slightly different method, Giant Eagle teamed with NCR to
create "The Personal Shopping System", a small display mounted
on each checkout lane. According to their press release the use of
these devices:
[...]gives
Giant Eagle the opportunity to strengthen one-to-one relationships with
valued customers by presenting personalized offers based on purchase
history from the Giant Eagle Advantage Card(R) loyalty program
Marsh Supermarkets has been
using a similar system for about 6 months, and in an article on their
newest store opening a spokesperson stated "When shoppers scan their
Marsh Fresh Idea cards at a terminal, special discounts that only apply
to them are listed". Systems such as this allow stores to make special
offers to only the "best" customers, without the knowledge of the
general public. And while press releases are often filled with
grandiose terms such as "valued customers" what they don't want you to
know is that the "valued" customer is the one who spends the most, and
is a small minority of their overall customer base.
For more information on this issue, see our web page on Customer Specific
Pricing, as well as our article on Dorothy Lane
Markets below.
Sources: Newswire, Yahoo, DMNews, The Noblesville Times
Government officials seek card data
Information
to be used to fight obesity
In a recent
parliamentary hearing in the United Kingdom addressing obesity MPs
suggested that data gained from "loyalty" cards could be used to
monitor customers eating habits. David Hinchcliffe, the committee
chairman, stated to the Tesco representative:
"You have enormous power with these," he said, holding
up a Sainsbury's Nectar card. "Perhaps there is a use for these to
steer people, in some respects, towards more healthy products."
Tesco's
representative stated that while card data could be used for such a
purpose, it was likely to alienate customers who would find it
"patronizing or draconian". While no supermarket representatives agreed
to hand over their customer data, neither did they rule out the
possibility for the future. Scottish officials have previously stated
their desire for what they termed "invaluable" data and that they
planned to examine "the scope for other uses to which loyalty card data
might be put."
Similar issues have also been raised in the United States, with one
presidential candidate asking for an inquiry and at least one
government agency attempting to obtain "loyalty" card data. The Washington Post reported that presidential
candidate Joe Lieberman as calling for the Federal Trade Commission to
look into the connection between junk food advertising and obesity.
Leiberman's campaign staff stated they would make no attempt to define
junk food, leaving that to dietary and health care experts. In
Connecticut, the Yale-Griffin Preventive Research Center
approached the Big Y grocery chain and proposed using information about
consumers’ eating habits gleaned from "loyalty" cards. The grocery
chain declined to participate, much to the lament of the centers
director, Dr. David Katz, who defended the program by saying obesity is
a public health issue and that card data would be used to help
consumers.
We suggest twinkie lovers start their hoard now while they still can,
(they have a phenomenal shelf life).
In a somewhat related development, a London professor has called on
"loyalty" card data to be used as a "blueprint for agri-businesses".
His thought is that by examining the data farmers could establish the
"non-price elements for which illogical and irrational consumers are
prepared to pay a premium". The professor was stated as saying:
"Do farmers and growers benefit from this information?
Yes they do, because when they know about this they can aim for a
premium for their basic products."
The
immediate question that comes to mind is why "basic products" should be
able to command a premium. This is another fine example of how card
data is being used against the majority of consumers, in this case by
letting the "Illogical and irrational consumers" set the price for
everyone else.
Sources: The Telegraph, The Guardian, The New Haven Register, Scotsman.com
Publix chooses privacy over "loyalty"
Supermarket
chain confirms commitment to customers
Florida based Publix supermarkets recently confirmed
their commitment to privacy by declining to start a two-tiered pricing
card program when they joined the "UPromise" college savings plan. A
store spokesperson stated:
"We don't have a loyalty programme because we think it's
unfair to treat customers differently. We appreciate all our customers'
business and offer the same price to everyone in the store,"
While CASPIAN opposes any program such as UPromise that
monitors shoppers habits, we recognize the right of individuals to
choose which programs they wish to participate in. Unlike most card
programs which have a two-tired pricing scheme that penalizes those
that refuse to participate, UPromise is entirely voluntary. However, we
also believe UPromise participants should carefully analyze if the
programs benefits outweigh the potential risk of having your purchasing
habits in a huge database, and the likelihood in today's business world
that UPromise will survive long enough to see your children's high
school graduation.
Our thanks to Publix for confirming their commitment to their
customers.
Source: The Wise Marketer
Free
turkey soon to be extinct
Holiday
offers become smaller, harder to qualify for
As you sit down to this years Thanksgiving or
Christmas dinner, there is a good chance your main course cost more
than it has in previous years. While holiday turkey offers are still a
staple of the supermarket industry, the amount of the discount appears
to be declining, at least in stores with card programs.
Ukrop's, a Richmond Virginia based grocer, formerly gave free turkeys
to each consumer who met any of the three qualifying spending levels,
which started at $500. This year the program has been scaled down so
that only the top tier, those that spend at least $1,250 between
September 15th and November 8th, qualify. A check of their web site
shows Ukrop's currently has frozen premium turkeys on sale for 37 cents
per Lb which results in a cost of $7.40 for a 20 Lb turkey. Is it
really worth spending $1,250 to receive something worth $7.40?
Kroger is offering $5 off any turkey up to 18 lbs., and $10 off
turkey's 18 lbs. and over. FoodLion customers can get a $20 gift
certificate if they spend $35 for 6 out of 8 weeks leading up to the
holidays, but not only do they have to use their "MVP" card, they also
have to turn in their receipts! (So much for the argument that
card programs save consumers hassle)
Meanwhile, a quick look at our local non-card store Meijer shows
consumers can receive $13 off any turkey 16.1 lbs. or more. Our
suggestion: forget the gimmicks and "free" turkey; shop at stores that
both respect your privacy and give you everyday low prices.
Source: Richmond VA Times Dispatch
Off-shoring
of jobs raises privacy concerns
Medical, tax
and credit data heading overseas
A recent series of articles by David
Lazarus in the San Francisco Chronicle detailed a number of different
situations where privately held data was finding its way overseas. The first article looks at a Pakistani medical
transcriptionist who threatened UCSF medical center with exposing
patient records online unless she received back pay. The second investigates how some accountants are
sending sensitive tax information offshore, while the third examines the how credit reporting agencies
are either using foreign sub-contractors or are planning on doing so in
the near future.
We do not know if any supermarket data is currently being processed
outside the United States or if there are any plans to do so in the
future, but with the financial incentives involved, (read: REAL
cheap labor), we expect it is only a matter of time before this begins
to happen. At that point your shopping history will be in the hands of
people that are not subject to U.S. laws and who may be compelled by
their financial circumstances to accept offers from third parties that
wish to acquire the data.
Point of Sale data being collected and sold
Credit and
debit card
information collected at retail stores
In the future it may not
matter if you have a "loyalty" card: stores are now collecting personal
information through credit and debit card transactions at the point of
sale. One Atlanta list broker is now offering such a list with their
sale flyer including this description:
"This unique database, using UPC information, will
allow marketers to identify consumers based on the products and brands
they have purchased with
100% accuracy. It also provides the ability to target consumers based
on
product category and individual brands."
From the product descriptions; allergy relief, stomach medicine,
analgesics etc., it would appear the 4 stores that are selling the data
are pharmacies. We also have information that after previously
prohibiting vendors from collecting POS data, VISA is now offering a
software package that allows them to capture it.
Privacy minded consumers might want to keep in mind that at this time
cash still doesn't allow for the collection of your personal habits
(but see our RFID pages to learn how currency may well be tracked in
the future).
Hooked on
Phonics and GNC Nutrition data compromised
Data sold
despite assurances of privacy policy
Two recent events demonstrate why
consumers should be leery of trusting the "privacy policy" of any
business collecting large amounts of data about them.
In the first, 5 million General Nutrition Center "loyalty" customers
may soon be in for a surprise: more junk mail. Two former company
executives
obtained the GNC list "through a legal loophole" and were offering it
for
sale. General Nutrition has said it has since taken steps to protect
its
member lists.
WPXI
The Pittsburgh Channel
Hooked On Phonics also found themselves on the hot seat after the
Washington Post revealed they were selling customer lists, despite a
privacy policy
stating they would never do so. The solution for Hooked On Phonics?
Change
the privacy policy to allow for these sales.
The Washington Post
Big business = Big prices
Detroit study
shows highest markups by national drug stores
Businesses
often tout "economies of scale", and their ability to purchase in
quantity with greater discounts, as the reason why corporate mergers
are good for both the business and the consumer. While it may be good
for the business, a recent study
in Detroit puts to rest the myth that it is good for consumers.
This study took a look at individual generic drug prices but we took
the study one step further and compared the combined cost for a
one month supply of the drugs. The wholesale cost of these 8
medications for a one months supply was $27.79. Costco came in with the
best price, at $91.50. One local pharmacy came in at $140.18, and
regional grocer Farmer Jacks priced them at $167.57. The next tier was
the larger chains; Kroger, Meijer, Walmart and Kmart, with an average
cost of $235.23, followed by a local pharmacy at $300.54.
The high price winners? Walgreens, Rite-Aid and CVS with an average
price of $363.75.
That's a $335.96 profit for filling a few bottles of pills.
Not bad work, if you can get it.
Detroit Now
Ohio grocer "segments" shoppers with personalized prices
Shopper card
data being put to discriminatory uses
Dorothy Lane Market, an upscale
grocery chain in Ohio, has implemented Customer Specific Pricing (CSP),
a practice where different prices are charged to each group of
customers. Now the majority of all discounts available in the store
only go to the identified top 30% of Dorothy Lane shoppers.
After starting their card program, Dorothy Lane eliminated
newspaper advertising and switched to an "in-store ad-sheet".
Once they were able to analyze their program data to determine
who their most profitable customers were they started mailing them
exclusive offers while at the same time reducing the size of the
discounts on their ad-sheet making them only marginally better than the
regular prices.
The store even segments the top 30% into three groups, with discounts
given according the customers' stature within that elite grouping.
Of course none of this would be possible without the rich databases
stores are compiling with their "loyalty" programs. While this is
the most complete example of CSP we have found to date, there is
evidence that the practice will soon be widespread. For example,
this quote from an NCR division president explains how wireless shelf
tags will soon work:
"A customer would be able to point a key fob at an electronic label and
it would flash back a specific price based on that customer's value to
the store."
It's important to keep in mind that most supermarket discounts are not
given by the store; they are given by the manufacturer. Not only
do the stores profit by denying sale prices to the "bottom tier" of
customers, they are profiting off the manufacturers as well by keeping
the difference.
For more information on pricing issues see our pricing overview
page. For more information on Dorothy Lane Markets' CSP practices, see
Brian Woolfs new book Loyalty Marketing: The Second Act.
"Smart Card" News
If the news here is not scary
enough for you, now you can get creeped out on a regular basis by
Smart Card News. This misguidedly optimistic site will inform you
of the progress of "Smart Cards," the gateway to a cashless world where
chip-encoded ID numbers will be required to buy food (and everything
else). It's produced by Faulkner & Gray EC Research, publishers of
such gems as Card
Marketing, Card Technology
and the ever ominous, and now hopefully defunct ID World
magazines.
CASPIAN
Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and
Numbering
An information clearinghouse and resource for
community and national action
© 1999-2005 Katherine Albrecht.
All rights reserved.
|