Philosophy

Home
Overview
FAQ
Essays
Hall of Shame

Information

RFID Information
Pricing issues
News
Supermarket List
Links

Action

Join the Fight
Current Protests
Feedback

About CASPIAN

Press



[Image of Cart]
Welcome!

Sign up for our newsletter!
Enter Email Address

CASPIAN: Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering

Supermarket Privacy News

To view the earlier edition of our news page see our original, non-indexed archives, our newer archives or return to our index of archives


Caveat Lector
Online newspaper registrations can lead to more than articles

(See our note at the bottom of this article about the "bugmenot" service)

CASPIAN staffers often spend much of their online time reading through various articles throughout the world on privacy and retail matters. We are growing weary, (as I suspect are many of you), of having to go through a lengthy registration processes in order to read a single article at a publication we are unlikely to revisit for years, if at all. And while many newspapers may employ reasonable tactics in their registration process, one recent experience opened our eyes as to how far some businesses will go in order to collect your personal information and then surreptitiously use it to market to you.

The Press-Enterprise is a southern California newspaper owned by Belo Interactive. In order to access any content within the site you must register, and I've archived the top half of the registration page here with the bottom half here. The first thing I like to do before submitting my personal information to a site I know nothing about is to take a look at the Privacy Policy, however the link shown on the top of the registration page that leads to the Privacy Policy actually lead to a "page not found" error, as archived here.

Strike one.

I did some digging around, and managed to find the actual Privacy Policy located on another page. Along with the usual wording it contained this statement:

We may also use your Personal Information, such as your e-mail address or mailing address, to contact you regarding products and/or services that may be of interest to you [...]


I was not too thrilled to see that the "price" for reading a single article, in a paper I had never been to before in more than 7 years of online reading and never expected to visit again, was to submit to a potential onslaught of never-ending advertising. But I also noticed that on the registration page I could uncheck the pre-checked "Yes! I want to be notified of any MySpecialsDirect exclusive discounts and special offers" box so I assumed I was safe from this threat provided I "opted-out". Since there was only that single box on the registration page relating to advertising I assumed it was all I needed to worry about and continued with the process. It was admittedly a poor assumption on my part.

On the registration page you are given a chance to select your "hobbies". Actually, you are REQUIRED to select at least one, even if it is just "other", which you find out when you fail to do so and it rejects your application, as archived here. The page reloads, highlighting the section you missed, but with all the information that you entered on the page intact with one notable exception: the "MySpecialDirect" box is once again checked even if you unchecked it before, an easily missed item.

Strike 2.

Definition of nanosecond: the amount of time between when you hit "submit" and realize you shouldn't have.

I of course missed the "easily missed item", and went back to correct it. Because I didn't know if I managed to catch it in time I decided to take a look at the "members preferences" page to make sure I wasn't set to receive any advertising. The "MySpecialDirect" box was indeed unchecked, but I was amazed to see that had "opted in" to receiving:

1) Phone calls
2) Postal advertising
3) Email advertising

(archived here.)

Strike 3.

I went back and re-read the privacy policy where further down the page it stated:

There are four contact preference options available: (1) “opt-in” includes you in our special offer, discount and other programs with respect to our advertisers and partners via our My Specials Direct e-mail program or a similar program; (2) “site” includes you in our special offer, discount and other programs that relate to this Site from PE.com; (3) “phone” allows you to be contacted by telephone with respect to any of these programs, and (4) “mail” allows you to be contacted by mail with respect to any of these programs. You may choose to be contacted by any or all of these methods, or “opt-out” by not selecting any contact options.


Technically, they appear to have covered this within the Privacy Policy, but the wording is far from clear. If you can "choose to be contacted by any or all of these methods", why would you need to "opt-out"? And while it states you can "'opt-out' by not selecting any contact options", they don't give you the option to "select" until it was already done for you.

What is technically sound isn't necessarily ethically sound. Few people read privacy policies, a well known fact by those within the industry. By intentionally placing a single box pertaining to advertising options within their registration process they are misleading people into believing that it is the only option available, even though it is only one of four advertising options. I'm sure it works quite well for them and while they may get few people signing up for "MySpecialDirect" I suspect they have a veritable flood of "willing" recipients for "email marketing, phone solicitations and postal solicitations".

Online businesses have a hard enough time attracting consumers and gaining their confidence without sleazy tactics such as this. The periodicals industry needs to both police their own and come up with reasonable standards that should be followed before consumers begin to look elsewhere and regulatory agencies are forced to step in. If the industry needs an example of what happens when you fail to respect your customers they need look no further than the telemarketing industry and the myriad of state and federal laws which now regulate it.

And for those of you within the industry that are mulling this over, please take another look at your mandatory registration practices. It makes no sense, for either you or me, to require registration from someone who is seeking out a single article on a single topic that you will probably never cover again. If you think someone from the Midwest is a good candidate for a subscription to a newspaper in California you've been hanging around breathing the newsprint fumes for far too long. We understand registration is a tool that helps you better compete and can find little fault in requiring it for regular readers. But why not just set a cookie for the occasional reader and require registration only for those that come back within a short time period, perhaps 7 days? Could the cookie be erased by the user so they wouldn't have to register? Sure, but think about it: do you really believe that people that go to that much trouble are actually good advertising prospects? And by eliminating the people that you have virtually -0- chance of successfully marketing to you might actually find your databases contain worthwhile information, instead of being filled with the garbage most people insert in order to bypass the system.

Think about it: its better for you, and your "real" customers, advertisers and consumers alike.

For another look at online registration, see this Wired article.

(A number of readers have written to us to suggest bugmenot as a solution to this problem. Bugmenot collects logins from users that others can then use to bypass the registration process. I've had mixed results with this; in some cases I've been able to log right in and in others finding that none of the various logins they suggest would work. Some web sites are also aware of this and rather than accept the fact that not everyone is willing to give them their life history to read a single article they disable those accounts they believe are used by multiple people.)


Card purchase records lead to arrest
Arson charges filed after fire starter purchase

KOMO TV in Seattle has reported that a veteran Lieutenant with the Tukwila Fire department was arrested for attempted arson after a fire at his own home. The station stated "Lyons' arrest came after detectives learned a grocery store card in his name showed he had purchased several fire starters." We have no way of knowing for certain why detectives decided to search those records but speculate that such data collection has probably become routine with at least some police departments.

We decline to speculate on the possible guilt or innocence of the suspect, focusing instead on a number of reasonable explanations for why the purchases could have shown up on his record. Fire starters are not an uncommon item, and it is quite possible the Lieutenant purchased them for camping or in his home fireplace. Even if he did purchase them with the attempt to commit arson wouldn't most people forgo the minor savings the card provides in order to avoid having the purchase tracked? And what better way to frame someone than to purchase an item identical to one you observed them buying in the past?

Retail stores attempt to portray privacy fears as being groundless but the fact remains that this data is accessible, and will continue to be so for years. And even though this data "might" help law enforcement officers, the potential is equally large to implicate people who have committed no crime.


The Surveillance-Industrial Complex
ACLU releases report on government access to consumer databases

The ACLU has released a 38 page report titled The Surveillance-Industrial Complex: How the American Government is Conscripting Businesses and Individuals in the Construction of a Surveillance Society. With the "The Privatization of Surveillance", the ACLU states:

The U.S. security establishment is rapidly increasing its ability to monitor average Americans by hiring or compelling private-sector corporations to provide billions of customer records. The explosive growth in surveillance by government and business is creating a "Surveillance Industrial Complex" that threatens all of our privacy.


The complete report is available at the above link, as well as methods to contact companies to urge them to respect your privacy. The Albuquerque Tribune also followed up with their local ACLU chapter and filed this report


Albertsons' goes on shopping spree
New England and California grocers added to Albertsons' "family"

Albertsons went on a recent spending spree, picking up approximately 200 New England based Shaws and Star Market stores, and then gobbling up the 11 stores of upscale Southern California grocer "Bristol Farms". The Shaws/Star Market purchase, (the nations 11th largest chain prior to the acquisition), brings the total number of Albertsons' retail locations to nearly 2500.

The Bristol purchase marks Albertsons' first foray into the upscale grocery market. It also marks the first time we've seen a major supermarket spell out their true intentions within their Press Release without sugarcoating it for the masses:

"We are thrilled to welcome Bristol Farms to Albertsons' world class family of stores," said Larry Johnston, chairman, CEO and president of Albertsons. "Bristol Farms has clearly built a solid leadership position in the Southern California specialty, gourmet market segment with strong performance over the past several years. This acquisition is the latest example of our dedication to diversify into new formats that can accelerate growth, tap into new customer segments and maximize return on invested capital."


There you have it. No smarmy language about their "commitment to serving their customers".
No superfluous comments on "maintaining high quality and service".
Just the basic facts of the modern supermarket world: monopolize, conquer, and profit.

Resistance is futile, you will be assimilated.


Albertsons' rolls out another card program
Osco Customers must use "preferred" card for discounts

On a visit to the local OSCO store recently we discovered that Albertsons' has decided to impose their dreaded "Preferred" card on OSCO shoppers. We find this to be somewhat ironic in that OSCO was one of the first stores in the U.S. to have a card program which was dropped many years ago, (to the applause of OSCO shoppers everywhere). That previous failure may well have formed part of the genesis of Albertsons' long forgotten pledge to their customers of "great prices without a card".

The customers don't forget though: while card free stores such as Publix have managed comparable store sales gains of 4.9% and 3% in the last two quarters, Albertsons' sales have climbed a pitiful .2%, and .3%, (omitting California sales figures, which, if included, dropped the comparable store sales to -1.3% and -3.7%). Throw in the negative statistics from the strike battered California stores, (where customers who returned after the strike found they needed a card to get the same sale prices they always received), and it would appear that Albertsons' shoppers are "preferring" to shop at stores that have more respect for their privacy.


How safe is your card data?
Programmer leaves secret "back door" into database

Businesses that run "loyalty" programs frequently state how important it is to protect their customers' privacy, but three recent articles show that consumers have ample reason to be concerned. In Information Week we found the following quote regarding one supermarket chain's database:

"Unisys chief security adviser Sunil Misra tells of a case where a member of the senior IT staff at a large supermarket chain created a secret backdoor so he could access and sell protected information."

While this security hole was found, (and we don't know if any information was indeed sold), there is no way of knowing if, or how many, others might exist. Even without a "back door" the data is still vulnerable, as outlined in a Bloomberg.com article concerning the recent theft of customer data at AOL. 92 million AOL screen names, along with their phone numbers and zip codes, were pilfered by an AOL employee, and then sold to spammers. Criminal intent isn't required for data release, as noted in this Register article that investigates a hard drive sold on Ebay that contained sensitive customer data.

While it is difficult, if not impossible, to reduce the chance of incidents such as the second and third happening in any company with which you do business, you can certainly limit your liability by reducing or eliminating your participation in programs where it is not mandatory for you to provide personal information. And as a reminder, even if you are using a "fake" identity with your local supermarket as soon as you write a check or use a credit card they can tie that information to your "fake" profile.

For more information on why using a fake name is not a solution, please see our page located here


How safe is your card data part II
Information sold on open market

Regular CASPIAN readers will remember that after the 9/11 tragedy a supermarket voluntarily gave their "loyalty" card data to federal authorities in the hope it might help find the perpetrators. Two recent articles caught our eye that suggest the release of this data may be more routine than the supermarkets would lead us to believe.

In the Atlanta Journal-Constitution database analyst Joe Patel is quoted as saying:

"Grocery stores routinely sell and trade customer preference databases compiled from those ever-popular discount shopping cards"
On the other side of the pond, Media Week states that Tesco, Thomas Pink, MVC and New Look have all released their customer information for sale to other marketers, and in the article below we detail the sale of card program data from retailer FootAction.

Our crystal ball is on the fritz so we can't predict where the next release of data will occur but the verdict is clear: if you don't want your personal data floating around the world you need to take steps to reduce your exposure.


The perils of privacy
databases result in unintended consequences for consumers

As databases grow, both in size and scope, we are starting to see more cases where consumers have found themselves in uncomfortable situations due to erroneous conclusions by those looking at the data. With so much information being collected and new uses being found for it every day, situations such as those below are likely to also increase.

In the UK a woman answered a knock at her door only to find herself arrested and her house searched from top to bottom. Her crime? Placing her own scarf in her handbag. Store security caught the move on camera and mistakenly thought she had stolen the scarf, and then tracked her through her "loyalty" card (The article doesn't state why they didn't just stop her in the store rather than wait two days to go to her house).
We can't be certain but we suspect most true criminals are not nearly as thoughtful towards authorities in providing their identity.

A family in California underwent a similar ordeal when authorities obtained a warrant to search their home believing they had a marijuana growing operation. Their crime? Having 3 kids that often left the lights on, lots of laundry, and electricity guzzling appliances such as computers that raised their power bill enough to spark the interest of the police.
Word to the wise: anyone attempting to duplicate the work of Dr. Frankenstein would be advised to purchase a large gas powered generator before proceeding.

If our suspects above were hungry and ordered a pizza, they may have found their troubles starting anew. According to USA Today the state of Missouri is using pizza delivery databases to find scofflaws. Pizza databases were found to be particularly effective, since people need to give out their correct address if they actually want to receive that pizzas they order.
We'll take ours with pepperoni and extra cheese, hold the invasive profiling.

If you do happen to find yourself arrested without cause, the good news is you won't have to find a lawyer: they will find you. According to USA Today , courts now routinely sell arrest records to database vendors, who promptly package them up and sell them to lawyers. It's amazing how quickly the lawyers come calling. Consider the case of a mentally ill man who was recently taken into custody. While his parents spent two days trying to locate him before authorities contacted them, letters from attorneys seeking his business were postmarked hours after the arrest.
The article didn't mention whether these attorneys handle invasion-of-privacy suits as well as criminal ones.

Sources: ICNetwork, The Star-Telegram


What do they know about you?
A little information goes a long way in establishing a consumer's profile

On more occasions than we care to count the phrase "why should I care who knows if I buy bread and milk" comes across our desk. While alone these may appear to be meaningless tidbits of little value, when combined with other data they form a complete picture of every consumer. As the technology improves for sorting the data, so does the thirst for putting it to use.

As noted in USA Today, databases LAST. While bread and milk may appear innocuous, if you start buying more it may signal an increase in the numbers of members of your household. If you usually purchase coke and ice cream and start buying diet coke and salad it may indicate a few extra inches around the waist you are attempting to lose. The products are only part of the picture: MediaWeek goes on to say, "Consequently, what is starting to happen is that marketers are analyzing behaviour and making assumptions. For example, if a customer has regularly started buying nappies it is safe to assume that they have had a baby.". If the vision of MediaWeek were to come true, soon your interactive television will have a place for you to insert your card, (to be "rewarded" of course), at which point they can gain more valuable information about both what you are watching, and when you are doing it.

And why is any of this a problem? Because the government, through programs such as TIA and MATRIX are now accessing that data, and likely will continue to. Perhaps USA Today's Andrew Kantor says it best:

In our country, we govern ourselves. Government is us. So imagine living in a neighborhood where your neighbors inspect your groceries every time you come back from the store, look to see who's sending you mail, and keep track of where you drive. Would you want to live there?

Remember: you are what you eat.


Politically correct profits
"Fair-Trade" goods help some retail stores far more than farmers

A Wall St. Journal article, reprinted at Truth About Trade, takes a look at "Fair-Trade" goods: products that are intended to give farmers a decent, living wage for their efforts. While the farmers do indeed make more than they might otherwise, the best profits often go to the supermarkets.

One U.K. supermarket tacked on $3.46 per pound for Fair-Trade coffee while the grower gets about 44 cents above the world market price. The same chain sold Fair-Trade bananas at nearly $2 more per Lb, while the grower received a mere 16 cents more.

Not all stores follow this practice: Whole Foods prices their Fair-Trade bananas and coffee at the same price as their regular organic brands. However, Whole Foods also lined coffee aisles with flyers stating that 5% of sales went to growers, but that percentage doesn't refer to the retail price, rather it is based on wholesale costs. Borders Book Stores were also found to be charging nearly $4 per Lb more for Fair-Trade coffee, substantially more than the growers received. When questioned about it they stated they "we have been prompted to assess our pricing", and promptly lowered the price.

Fair-Trade products can be an excellent way to help ensure farmers throughout the world receive decent wages for their efforts, but if you wish to participate you should make sure the extra money you spend makes it into the hands of the intended, and not the retail store's stockholders.


Personal Privacy a thing of the past?
A future where employers monitor your every breath

A Businessweek Online interview with futurist Faith Popcorn points to a rosy world where your employer will take care of your every need and personal privacy fails to exist.

"[...] your employer will be taking care of all your personal and physical needs to increase your productivity. Your kids, your dinner, your clothing needs, your books, your movies -- would all be provided through your company. For instance, your vital signs will be measured at work. If the measurements say you have high cholesterol and too much fat in your diet, you might get prescription menus. And the food would be delivered to your refrigerator at your home nearby. "
She goes on to state:
"Sensors will measure your stress levels, your food needs levels, your psychological levels. They'll measure if some problem with your kids or your mate is affecting your productivity. All your needs will be measured and prescribed and fulfilled. The happier the worker, the higher the productivity -- and companies are starting to realize that already."
We can't help but wonder if in the latter situation the corporate legal department would be called in to initiate divorce proceedings on your behalf; for the good of the company of course.

All we can say is "Wow, that sure sounds like a fun life".

Not.


The interactive urinal
The latest in intrusive advertising

We thought we'd seen it all, but this new device tops everything for intrusive advertising. As reported in The Washington Times, "Wizmark", is marketing a new "interactive urinal display". A 3.5" screen is activated by movement or the flow of fluids, and includes flashing lights and a message.

Unless we miss our mark, we expect similar intrusions to continue.


TIA alive and well?
If the government isn't monitoring us, where ARE they getting all this information?

Every once in a while you run across something that just makes you go hmmmmmm, and a few recent articles have had that effect on us. First up: a Sulphur Daily News report that authorities questioned a Louisiana woman about credit card purchases made at Lowes, investigating "spending habits that entailed the purchase of large quantities of material conducive to the manufacture of bombs". While possible, it would seem unlikely that a credit card company would install software to flag such purchases, and virtually impossible for it to be found in any other way. One reasonable explanation would be that a cashier flagged the purchase, but the article states the questioning arose due to credit card purchases. So how'd they get the data?

In the middle of the country, the The Riverfront Times reports that a St. Louis man was visited by the Secret Service after using the words "Bush" and "bin Laden" in the same sentence in an email to a neighbor he was feuding with. The man believes that the neighbor may have turned him in, but there has been no confirmation on where the Secret Service obtained a copy of the email.

And finally, Capitol Hill Blue is reporting that TIA is alive and well and living in Arlington, VA. Even though Congress cut off funding for the program, this report states it was just moved into the pentagon's secret "black bag" funding.

We're sure there must be some mistake, as nobody would ever lie to Congress about secretive programs. Ollie North told us so.


Albertsons rolls out California card program
When labor lockout ends, card program begins

On November 22nd, 2003, the North County Times ran this article which stated:

"Some of the goods on the shelf in Albertsons were posted with "club" prices, despite the fact that Albertson's in Southern California has no loyalty or club card program."
At the time we wondered if their plan was to start a card program as soon as the labor problems were resolved, and sure enough, this week Albertsons started running advertising announcing the scheme.

The ad, a copy of which is located here, states:
"When the labor strike is over, saving money will get a whole lot easier"
We're somewhat baffled as to why it would be "easier" to be required to fill out a form and then show a card every time you shop, however the reasoning behind the decision by Albertsons is crystal clear. The data we have compiled from various sources shows that when card programs begin, prices throughout the store rise. What better time to start a card program then after you've lost millions of dollars in a protracted labor dispute? What is considerably less clear is whether California consumers, already alienated by the labor troubles, will greet this new development with open arms. While it may give a temporary boost to their bottom line, our prediction is that over the long haul consumers will flock to their competitors.

Unfortunately, the bad news surrounding Albertsons doesn't end there. The chain also recently announced a major restructuring of their operations, and in their press release stated one of the goals for centralizing some portions of their operations as being: "executing powerful merchandising promotions that make life easier for our customers." While that doesn't explicitly state card programs are in the works for the few remaining Albertsons locations that don't already have them, we suspect it is only a matter of time, and a short time at that, before all stores will adopt them.

It is hard to believe that a chain that at one time gained a considerable following by promising "Great prices without a card" has so completely changed course, and turned their backs on the customers that trusted them.

Sources: KESQ TV, Palm Springs


Card free supermarkets top survey
Publix, Supervalue obtain highest ratings in customer satisfaction

The American Customer Satisfaction Index, a joint project of the University of Michigan School of Business, the American Society for Quality and CFI group, recently released their 4th quarter satisfaction index, a copy of which can be found here. The supermarket sector was led by Publix with the outstanding score of 82, (the highest score of any brick and mortar retailer), a 1.2% increase from the previous year. Following a close second at 77 was Supervalue, with the general category of "all others" next at 75. Rounding out the bottom 4 are our not-so-favorite card stores: Albertsons (73), Winn Dixie (73), Safeway (71) and Kroger (71). Both Safeway and Kroger slipped dramatically during the past year: -6.6% and -5.3% respectively, and Kroger has dropped an alarming 9% since the baseline study in 1994.

While it is difficult to attribute the winners excellent scores entirely to their card free status, we believe it certainly has a major impact. After all, stores that respect their customers don't require them to jump through hoops to get savings, nor do they try to pull the wool over their eyes by stating savings that are inflated due to excessive prices. The only way a business will gain respect is by giving it, and our thanks go out to Publix, Supervalue, and all the other small stores who scored well by respecting, and not manipulating, their customers.

In a related development, Accenture released a new study on consumer and business attitudes towards trust, privacy, and access to personal data. While consumers were most trusting of their employers, banks and health insurers, they were least trusting of online retailers and supermarkets. This is in stark contrast to a study from two years ago which showed 69% of Americans didn't trust corporate America, yet of the businesses they did trust, supermarkets came in at number 1. As Ann Landers once said, "Wake up and smell the coffee". American consumers have, its time for supermarket executives to do so as well.

Sources:Progressive Grocer, The Wise Marketer (registration required).


"Loyalty" program data for sale
Footaction "Starclub" membership information found on list broker web site

Most companies in the United States supplement their income by selling lists of their customers, most often without their knowledge or consent. If you subscribe to a magazine or have purchased something through a catalog the odds are high that your name, and your personal information, is being sold to others. Most "loyalty" programs though are quite explicit in stating your personal information will not be sold or rented to third parties.

While looking through various list brokers we came across this listing at Walter Karl Interactive for the Footaction "loyalty" club. The membership is described as "trend-setting, highly fashion conscious consumers" who are "Extremely Direct Mail Responsive", with an average age from 14 to 26. Beside the basic listings of 1,595,645 - 12 Month Loyalty Club Members, 50,808 - Monthly New Members, 376,148 - 12 Month Active Gold Club Members and 46,122 - Monthly Gold Club Members, purchasers can also select additional items such as Phone Number, State, Zip code, Gender, Date of Birth, Internet Source, Dollar - LP (last purchase), Dollar - AP (annual purchase), and product. This is not particularly unusual in the list brokerage business, and similar lists can be found by the thousands. It only gained our attention because it is not often you see "loyalty" club data for sale.

In investigating this story we were unable to determine what, if any, privacy policy governs the data of "starclub" members, or if the sale of the information violates any stated promise to consumers. While Footaction.com does have a privacy policy online, there is no way of knowing if it governs their "starclub" members as well, and it in fact does allow for them to "share the information with their business partners or others that are prescreened by Footstar". Many people would be surprised to learn that this "sharing" happens through list brokers, and that the listing contains no mention of "pre screening" by Footstar. (Some listings DO state within them the mailing must be pre approved by the company.)

As "loyalty" programs proliferate throughout the world we expect to find similar lists for sale in the future. For anyone considering joining one of these programs you might want to read through the application form to make sure your purchases don't end up being sold to the highest bidder.


You're not paranoid: they ARE watching you
Retail surveillance surreptitiously monitors shoppers

Two recent articles highlight the depths retailers will go to in order to determine the optimal method of selling their products. Tracking Hot Spots, appearing in the Portland Maine Press Herald on January 27th, takes a look at how one local Hannaford grocery allowed an Oregon business to set up an extensive tracking system in their store. The system collected data on where the shoppers traveled, and then married their register purchase information to with the route taken. While the store stated the information was not tied to individual users, that is small comfort for the people who were used as lab rats.

In Soon, marketing will follow you, Wired magazine investigates if the futuristic scenario from the movie "Minority Report" is actually in the future, or if it exists today. While widespread implementation has yet to see the light of day, primarily due to cost, devices that can determine your profile and then produce marketing that is directed to you are already in the testing phase. Using facial recognition technology that can determine race, age and sex, these devices then produce a marketing message geared towards your demographics. It isn't hard to imagine in the near future these devices being coupled to the extensive data being compiled on the general population, especially the information gleaned through "loyalty" programs, and the messages truly become targeted to one individual. But in one telling comment retail consultant Paco Underhill, the founder of Envirosell,stated:

"One of the realities of our lives is that we have a consumer base out there that is reacting very badly to some of the ways technology and marketing have met," he says.
Perhaps it is more appropriate to just state that the consumer base is tired of the constant prodding and pushing of direct marketing and would prefer to just be left alone.


Anti-card legislation proposed in Colorado
Senate bill would prohibit card programs in supermarkets

Colorado State Senator Ken Chlouber recently introduced Senate Bill 04-081 which would prohibit supermarkets from offering discounts tied to a card. Senator Chlouber stated in a Durango Herald article "I think it's an incredible violation of privacy, and I don't like them keeping records on what I buy". Senator Chlouber indicated the bill would likely face a fight and even if the bill should fail the public will have gained knowledge about how these programs operate.

CASPIAN has always advocated a free market approach to this issue and has not taken a stance on this legislation. however we have offered our assistance to the Colorado legislature to provide pertinent information on the issue as needed. The bill is currently in committee.

Sources: The Durango Herald, Rocky Mountain News.


QFC struggles to regain lost customers
Chain relaxes card usage requirements

When Kroger owned QFC started their card program CASPIAN was inundated with letters from upset and concerned QFC shoppers. The opposition was strong with extensive media coverage, much of which is detailed on our QFC page. QFC initially responded by telling people to use a fake name to apply, a move that surprised even us, and one that has now been repeated by Albertsons.

Almost two years have passed since the debut of the card, but according to this King County Journal article things are still not going well for QFC. Seattle grocery analyst Jeff Tryka stated "The quality's declined, but the prices haven't". In an attempt to woo back lost customers QFC has now gone one step further; eliminating the need to identify each card with an individual. All customers now need to do is flash their card at the cashier, and then punch in any ten digit number.

While this certainly makes card programs somewhat more palatable for those in Seattle, it still doesn't change the fact that our research shows stores with card programs have the highest of prices, and Seattle consumers would probably be better off taking their business elsewhere.


Card focus shifting
Future discounts to be based on purchase history

One of the great laments about card programs within the industry has been the inability to capitalize on all the data that has been collected. That is all starting to change with new programs that allow retail establishments to base their offers on past shopping history. For the average consumer, (and statistically that includes 70% of us), the likely outcome will be less offers and higher prices, as discounts are geared only towards the most profitable customers.

Super Fresh, an A&P owned chain, recently modified their "loyalty" program to one with three different levels of benefits, with membership in each level based on the customers past purchase history. Super Fresh is working with Denver based Customer Communications Group to develop the program, and Sallie Burnett, CCG's vice president of national sales, had these interesting comments about the program:

"Our role was to take this data and make it actionable and relevant to the customer, and to develop programs to communicate to that customer based on the customer value to the organization."
"The loyalty program itself becomes an infrastructure to deliver targeted offers for the course of the year and to respond to customer behavior accordingly"
One can only assume that responding "accordingly" is unlikely to be a GOOD thing for those customers who's "value to the organization" isn't rated very highly.

Using a slightly different method, Giant Eagle teamed with NCR to create "The Personal Shopping System", a small display mounted on each checkout lane. According to their press release the use of these devices:
[...]gives Giant Eagle the opportunity to strengthen one-to-one relationships with valued customers by presenting personalized offers based on purchase history from the Giant Eagle Advantage Card(R) loyalty program
Marsh Supermarkets has been using a similar system for about 6 months, and in an article on their newest store opening a spokesperson stated "When shoppers scan their Marsh Fresh Idea cards at a terminal, special discounts that only apply to them are listed". Systems such as this allow stores to make special offers to only the "best" customers, without the knowledge of the general public. And while press releases are often filled with grandiose terms such as "valued customers" what they don't want you to know is that the "valued" customer is the one who spends the most, and is a small minority of their overall customer base.

For more information on this issue, see our web page on Customer Specific Pricing, as well as our article on Dorothy Lane Markets below.

Sources: Newswire, Yahoo, DMNews, The Noblesville Times


Government officials seek card data
Information to be used to fight obesity

In a recent parliamentary hearing in the United Kingdom addressing obesity MPs suggested that data gained from "loyalty" cards could be used to monitor customers eating habits. David Hinchcliffe, the committee chairman, stated to the Tesco representative:

"You have enormous power with these," he said, holding up a Sainsbury's Nectar card. "Perhaps there is a use for these to steer people, in some respects, towards more healthy products."
Tesco's representative stated that while card data could be used for such a purpose, it was likely to alienate customers who would find it "patronizing or draconian". While no supermarket representatives agreed to hand over their customer data, neither did they rule out the possibility for the future. Scottish officials have previously stated their desire for what they termed "invaluable" data and that they planned to examine "the scope for other uses to which loyalty card data might be put."

Similar issues have also been raised in the United States, with one presidential candidate asking for an inquiry and at least one government agency attempting to obtain "loyalty" card data. The Washington Post reported that presidential candidate Joe Lieberman as calling for the Federal Trade Commission to look into the connection between junk food advertising and obesity. Leiberman's campaign staff stated they would make no attempt to define junk food, leaving that to dietary and health care experts. In Connecticut, the Yale-Griffin Preventive Research Center approached the Big Y grocery chain and proposed using information about consumers’ eating habits gleaned from "loyalty" cards. The grocery chain declined to participate, much to the lament of the centers director, Dr. David Katz, who defended the program by saying obesity is a public health issue and that card data would be used to help consumers.

We suggest twinkie lovers start their hoard now while they still can, (they have a phenomenal shelf life).

In a somewhat related development, a London professor has called on "loyalty" card data to be used as a "blueprint for agri-businesses". His thought is that by examining the data farmers could establish the "non-price elements for which illogical and irrational consumers are prepared to pay a premium". The professor was stated as saying:
"Do farmers and growers benefit from this information? Yes they do, because when they know about this they can aim for a premium for their basic products."
The immediate question that comes to mind is why "basic products" should be able to command a premium. This is another fine example of how card data is being used against the majority of consumers, in this case by letting the "Illogical and irrational consumers" set the price for everyone else.

Sources: The Telegraph, The Guardian, The New Haven Register, Scotsman.com


Publix chooses privacy over "loyalty"
Supermarket chain confirms commitment to customers

Florida based Publix supermarkets recently confirmed their commitment to privacy by declining to start a two-tiered pricing card program when they joined the "UPromise" college savings plan. A store spokesperson stated:

"We don't have a loyalty programme because we think it's unfair to treat customers differently. We appreciate all our customers' business and offer the same price to everyone in the store,"
While CASPIAN opposes any program such as UPromise that monitors shoppers habits, we recognize the right of individuals to choose which programs they wish to participate in. Unlike most card programs which have a two-tired pricing scheme that penalizes those that refuse to participate, UPromise is entirely voluntary. However, we also believe UPromise participants should carefully analyze if the programs benefits outweigh the potential risk of having your purchasing habits in a huge database, and the likelihood in today's business world that UPromise will survive long enough to see your children's high school graduation.

Our thanks to Publix for confirming their commitment to their customers.

Source: The Wise Marketer


Free turkey soon to be extinct
Holiday offers become smaller, harder to qualify for

As you sit down to this years Thanksgiving or Christmas dinner, there is a good chance your main course cost more than it has in previous years. While holiday turkey offers are still a staple of the supermarket industry, the amount of the discount appears to be declining, at least in stores with card programs.

Ukrop's, a Richmond Virginia based grocer, formerly gave free turkeys to each consumer who met any of the three qualifying spending levels, which started at $500. This year the program has been scaled down so that only the top tier, those that spend at least $1,250 between September 15th and November 8th, qualify. A check of their web site shows Ukrop's currently has frozen premium turkeys on sale for 37 cents per Lb which results in a cost of $7.40 for a 20 Lb turkey. Is it really worth spending $1,250 to receive something worth $7.40?

Kroger is offering $5 off any turkey up to 18 lbs., and $10 off turkey's 18 lbs. and over. FoodLion customers can get a $20 gift certificate if they spend $35 for 6 out of 8 weeks leading up to the holidays, but not only do they have to use their "MVP" card, they also have to turn in their receipts! (So much for the argument that card programs save consumers hassle)

Meanwhile, a quick look at our local non-card store Meijer shows consumers can receive $13 off any turkey 16.1 lbs. or more. Our suggestion: forget the gimmicks and "free" turkey; shop at stores that both respect your privacy and give you everyday low prices.

Source: Richmond VA Times Dispatch


Off-shoring of jobs raises privacy concerns
Medical, tax and credit data heading overseas
A recent series of articles by David Lazarus in the San Francisco Chronicle detailed a number of different situations where privately held data was finding its way overseas. The first article looks at a Pakistani medical transcriptionist who threatened UCSF medical center with exposing patient records online unless she received back pay. The second investigates how some accountants are sending sensitive tax information offshore, while the third examines the how credit reporting agencies are either using foreign sub-contractors or are planning on doing so in the near future.

We do not know if any supermarket data is currently being processed outside the United States or if there are any plans to do so in the future, but with the financial incentives involved, (read: REAL cheap labor), we expect it is only a matter of time before this begins to happen. At that point your shopping history will be in the hands of people that are not subject to U.S. laws and who may be compelled by their financial circumstances to accept offers from third parties that wish to acquire the data.


Point of Sale data being collected and sold
Credit and debit card information collected at retail stores

In the future it may not matter if you have a "loyalty" card: stores are now collecting personal information through credit and debit card transactions at the point of sale. One Atlanta list broker is now offering such a list with their sale flyer including this description:

"This unique database, using UPC information, will allow marketers to identify consumers based on the products and brands they have purchased with 100% accuracy. It also provides the ability to target consumers based on product category and individual brands."
From the product descriptions; allergy relief, stomach medicine, analgesics etc., it would appear the 4 stores that are selling the data are pharmacies. We also have information that after previously prohibiting vendors from collecting POS data, VISA is now offering a software package that allows them to capture it.

Privacy minded consumers might want to keep in mind that at this time cash still doesn't allow for the collection of your personal habits (but see our RFID pages to learn how currency may well be tracked in the future).


Hooked on Phonics and GNC Nutrition data compromised
Data sold despite assurances of privacy policy

Two recent events demonstrate why consumers should be leery of trusting the "privacy policy" of any business collecting large amounts of data about them.

In the first, 5 million General Nutrition Center "loyalty" customers may soon be in for a surprise: more junk mail. Two former company executives obtained the GNC list "through a legal loophole" and were offering it for sale. General Nutrition has said it has since taken steps to protect its member lists.
WPXI
The Pittsburgh Channel

Hooked On Phonics also found themselves on the hot seat after the Washington Post revealed they were selling customer lists, despite a privacy policy stating they would never do so. The solution for Hooked On Phonics? Change the privacy policy to allow for these sales.
The Washington Post


Big business = Big prices
Detroit study shows highest markups by national drug stores

Businesses often tout "economies of scale", and their ability to purchase in quantity with greater discounts, as the reason why corporate mergers are good for both the business and the consumer. While it may be good for the business, a recent study in Detroit puts to rest the myth that it is good for consumers.

This study took a look at individual generic drug prices but we took the study one step further and compared the combined cost for a one month supply of the drugs. The wholesale cost of these 8 medications for a one months supply was $27.79. Costco came in with the best price, at $91.50. One local pharmacy came in at $140.18, and regional grocer Farmer Jacks priced them at $167.57. The next tier was the larger chains; Kroger, Meijer, Walmart and Kmart, with an average cost of $235.23, followed by a local pharmacy at $300.54.

The high price winners? Walgreens, Rite-Aid and CVS with an average price of $363.75.

That's a $335.96 profit for filling a few bottles of pills.
Not bad work, if you can get it.
Detroit Now


Ohio grocer "segments" shoppers with personalized prices
Shopper card data being put to discriminatory uses


Dorothy Lane Market, an upscale grocery chain in Ohio, has implemented Customer Specific Pricing (CSP), a practice where different prices are charged to each group of customers. Now the majority of all discounts available in the store only go to the identified top 30% of Dorothy Lane shoppers. 

After starting  their card program, Dorothy Lane eliminated newspaper advertising and switched to an "in-store ad-sheet".  Once they were able to  analyze their program data to determine who their most profitable customers were they started mailing them exclusive offers while at the same time reducing the size of the discounts on their ad-sheet making them only marginally better than the regular prices.

The store even segments the top 30% into three groups, with discounts given according the customers' stature within that elite grouping.

Of course none of this would be possible without the rich databases stores are compiling with their "loyalty" programs.  While this is the most complete example of CSP we have found to date, there is evidence that the practice will soon be widespread.  For example, this quote from an NCR division president explains how wireless shelf tags will soon work:

"A customer would be able to point a key fob at an electronic label and it would flash back a specific price based on that customer's value to the store."

It's important to keep in mind that most supermarket discounts are not given by the store; they are given by the manufacturer.  Not only do the stores profit by denying sale prices to the "bottom tier" of customers, they are profiting off the manufacturers as well by keeping the difference.

For more information on pricing issues see our pricing overview page. For more information on Dorothy Lane Markets' CSP practices, see Brian Woolfs new book Loyalty Marketing: The Second Act


"Smart Card" News

If the news here is not scary enough for you, now you can get creeped out on a regular basis by Smart Card News. This misguidedly optimistic site will inform you of the progress of "Smart Cards," the gateway to a cashless world where chip-encoded ID numbers will be required to buy food (and everything else). It's produced by Faulkner & Gray EC Research, publishers of such gems as Card Marketing, Card Technology and the ever ominous, and now hopefully defunct ID World magazines.


 


CASPIAN
Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering
An information clearinghouse and resource for community and national action

© 1999-2005 Katherine Albrecht. All rights reserved.